tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6780103924890350442.post390620331366516458..comments2023-11-30T00:29:08.106-08:00Comments on Animal Pharm: Hans v. Luke (v. Princess Leia)Dr. B Ghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15451872961651116061noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6780103924890350442.post-1226067236590479762010-07-12T10:20:14.226-07:002010-07-12T10:20:14.226-07:00Thank you Neo!! *haaa!*
That is great -- I have n...Thank you Neo!! *haaa!*<br /><br />That is great -- I have not had a chance to ck out Lindeberg's latest. I'm getting into evolutionary pyschology -- just picked up Red Queen that everyone talks about. Ridley is cool.<br /><br />Yes -- nutritional science (like medical science) appears totally submitted to the dark ages... who knows when the tide will turn??!<br /><br />-GDr. B Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15451872961651116061noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6780103924890350442.post-7617631670167412052010-07-11T08:37:16.716-07:002010-07-11T08:37:16.716-07:00Yes, Jamie, and the foxiest of all is Mrs G hrself...Yes, Jamie, and the foxiest of all is Mrs G hrself! ^^<br /><br />Personally, I love evolutionary psychology. It just wraps everything up the way nothing else can. It has it's limitations, but many people seem to just focus on them.<br /><br />I actually have studied evolution in a way as a social science student for years now (I'll graduate when I'm ready!). I've not so intimate with it's "real" dimension but I have to know it's implications pretty well to be able to comment it academically. Iäm interested (professionally) in it's impact upon it's words, notions, discourses and so on.<br /><br />I also attended years ago to biology, yet missed my chance and took a different, perhaps even better positioned and more "PR" view on it. You know, most social scientists have incredibly little knowledge and/or interest in evolutionism as a thinking system, since it seems to directly oppose what social science stands for.<br /><br />It seems obvious to me that several tremendously *humanistically* important fields like nutrition stand pretty far from adoption the Darwinian Grand Theory to it's tool pack. I just read Staffan Lindeberg's incredible Food and Western Disease and remain gobsmacked how little these brilliant hypotheses seem to have had real effect on nutrition theory and research as far as I know it. <br /><br />Modern nutrition seems a lot like Creationism in it's innate inability to look critically at its premises and basic assumptions.Neonomidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00961709424324961929noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6780103924890350442.post-80255755440918494882010-07-09T03:33:16.371-07:002010-07-09T03:33:16.371-07:00As if the excellent information we get from your b...As if the excellent information we get from your blog isn't enough, we get photo's of well foxy women!!<br /><br />Love ya work!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com